ホワイトハウスの仮想通貨方針が波紋！戦略的ビットコイン備蓄が削除⁉XRP・XLMに追い風か？
Well, today, let’s delve into the much-anticipated White House report on cryptocurrencies. Yes. The document you’ve brought with you is Coingape’s White House Report on Regulation and Bitcoin Reserves. Right. I’d like to take a look at this 166- page report and get some insight into U.S. regulation, adoption, and the much-talked-about Bitcoin reserve. Yes . This is a report from the Digital Asset Working Group under the Tromp administration. Hmm. The main point is laying the groundwork for the U.S. to usher in a golden age of cryptocurrencies. I think it strongly encourages a comprehensive regulatory framework. I see. A golden age? The first step toward achieving that is regulatory clarity. So, what is the report’s most emphasized point regarding regulatory clarity ? Well, it calls for regulatory authorities to expedite the creation of clear rules to facilitate the trading and use of cryptocurrencies. Right . This shows that the United States wants to take the lead in this field. Meanwhile, has there been any new developments regarding the strategic Bitcoin reserve, which the market was really excited about? Well , the main body of this report didn’t mention anything new about it. Oh , I see. It was an item that was mentioned in the January presidential address, so some people might be surprised, but it wasn’t mentioned this time. Wow. That’s interesting. It seemed like the reserve discussion was taking precedence. Yes. However, a White House source said that, separate from the report, the government’s cryptocurrency reserve, or what’s being called a crypto stockpile, is in the works. I see. So perhaps the reason it wasn’t mentioned in the report was because they decided that the most immediate issue, establishing a regulatory framework, was the top priority. Regulatory framework? Yes. What specific proposals are being made? Familiar names like the CFTC and the SEC are mentioned. Yes. There’s a very important proposal. First, to Congress, there’s a gap in the CFTC’s oversight authority over non-securities, i.e., cryptoassets that aren’t securities . The Security Act is intended to fill that gap. We urge its passage. It’s already been passed by the membership, right? Ah, that’s right. Yes. And we’re calling on the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (as mentioned earlier) to create uniform federal rules for basic aspects like business registration, asset custody, and trading rules. I see. Furthermore, they’re concerned about the slow regulatory approval process. For example, they point out that the SEC takes up to 240 days to approve spot Bitcoin ETFs, and say it should be expedited. There’s also a call for speed, and there’s mention of current regulations, which is a real concern for those dealing with stablecoins like Ripple and Circle. You ‘re absolutely right. The Deportivo is asking the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Depository Center, the FDIC, and the OCC, the major banking regulators, to clarify what banks should do with stablecoins and blockchain technology . I see. I see. They’re also asking for clarification on how cryptocurrency companies can obtain banking licenses and how banks can properly reflect cryptocurrency-related risks in their capital. Yes . Looking at this in the larger context of how cryptocurrencies are integrated into the existing financial system, I think this is a very important move. It has a strong infrastructure development aspect. Yes. Were there any other notable points? Like anti-money laundering measures and tax issues. Yes, there are. Regarding anti-money laundering measures, they’re asking regulators and the Treasury Department to clarify the obligations and reporting requirements of cryptocurrency-related businesses under the Bank Secrecy Act, the major anti-money laundering law . And then there’s the tax aspect. This is a proposal to Congress, but it proposes that digital assets be considered a new asset class and that modified versions of the tax rules that apply to commodities and securities be applied to them. I see . Another interesting point is that wash sales, rules that prevent tax evasion by immediately buying back the same asset after realizing a loss, also apply to cryptocurrency transactions. Yes. They’re recommending that they be applied. I see. This raises questions about how this would be reconciled with, for example, the proposed bill by Senator Lummis, which would exempt elementary transactions from tax. I see. So, taking all of this into consideration, what is your biggest takeaway? Well , can we see this report as a strong indication of the U.S.’s determination to take the lead in establishing rules for crypto assets? Yes, I think that’s undeniable. This could potentially lead to further integration into trading and banking systems. Yes. Yes. However, it’s important to note that there was no specific discussion about the Bitcoin reserve this time. I see. Perhaps this is a message that creating a regulatory framework is the top priority at the moment. Hmm. Finally, there’s one thought experiment I’d like you to consider . When you look at the world, in a time like this when the emphasis is on domestic regulatory development, doesn’t it seem like the stances on crypto assets vary quite a bit from country to country? Yes, that’s true. Given this current situation, I wonder how the US intends to approach international agreements on rules in this field in the future. Aren’t you a little curious about what lies beyond domestic priorities?
ホワイトハウスが発表した最新の仮想通貨政策レポートに「戦略的ビットコイン備蓄計画」が含まれていなかったことで、仮想通貨業界に動揺が走っています。
BTCの国家戦略からの除外が示唆するものとは？XRPやXLM、さらにはCBDC戦略への影響も解説します。
💡 本動画は以下のテーマに触れています：
米国政府の仮想通貨規制方針
戦略的ビットコイン備蓄の取り消し
XRP・XLMの今後の見通し
クリプトストックファイルは？
投資家の注目点と市場インパクト
#仮想通貨,#CryptoNews（世界の最新暗号資産ニュース）, #XRPニュース,#XRPupdate（リップルの動向）, #ホワイトハウス暗号政策, #WhiteHouseCrypto（米政府の仮想通貨方針）, #BTC,#ビットコイン,#ETH,#イーサリアム, #米国政策と仮想通貨, #CryptoRegulation（規制動向）, #戦略的資産,#StrategicAssets（国家保有の暗号資産）, #仮想通貨市場,#CryptoMarket（全体相場の動き）, #最新仮想通貨情報,#AltcoinNews（アルトコインニュース）, #デジタルドル,#CBDC（中央銀行デジタル通貨）, #仮想通貨投資家向け情報, #ブロックチェーン政策,#BlockchainPolicy